Is the return of the merchant banking model the key to unlocking effective investment in Africa?

.

Africa’s economic narrative is one of undeniable dynamism, characterised by innovation, demographic advantages, and vast untapped potential. Yet, converting this potential into widespread, sustainable prosperity hinges significantly on effective capital allocation, particularly for the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and mid-market companies that form the bedrock of its economies. While established financial models – global investment banking, private equity, development finance – each play crucial roles, we argue that a revival of the ethos and function of traditional merchant banking is essential to fully unlock Africa’s growth engine.

.

For decades, the global financial landscape has seen increasing specialisation. Investment banks excel at large-scale underwriting, M&A advisory, and trading, typically acting as intermediaries or advisors rather than long-term principals in the ventures they facilitate. Private equity firms deploy substantial capital but often operate within fixed-term fund structures demanding specific return profiles and exit timelines. While highly effective in many contexts, these models can inadvertently leave a gap.

.

Merchant banking, in its historical essence, represented a different paradigm. It was characterised by a hybrid model combining financial advisory with significant principal investing – deploying the firm’s own or partners’ capital directly into client companies, often SMEs and family businesses. This wasn’t merely providing capital; it was about forging long-term partnerships, taking board seats, offering strategic counsel grounded in shared risk, and nurturing businesses over extended horizons.

.

.

The African Imperative: A Natural Alignment

This seemingly ‘old-fashioned’ model resonates powerfully with the contemporary African context. Why?

.

1.Dominance of the “Missing Middle”: Africa’s economic vibrancy resides significantly in its SMEs and mid-market companies. These entities frequently find themselves too large for microfinance yet lacking the scale or track record for traditional bank debt or the attention of bulge-bracket investment banks and large-cap PE funds. Merchant banking, with its inherent flexibility and focus on bespoke solutions for this segment, is ideally suited to bridge this critical funding gap.
2.Demand for Capital Plus Expertise: Access to capital is only part of the equation. Many promising African businesses require hands-on strategic guidance – in governance, financial structuring, operational efficiency, market access – to navigate growth effectively. The merchant banking model, with its emphasis on partnership and active involvement, provides this integrated support system far more naturally than purely transactional finance. Interests are inherently aligned through shared equity.
3.Patient Capital for Sustainable Growth: The pressure for rapid exits inherent in some fund structures may not always align with the optimal long-term trajectory for businesses operating in developing markets. The merchant banking ethos favours patient capital, allowing businesses the time to mature, weather economic cycles, and build enduring value.

.

.

Navigating the Ecosystem: Complementarity with DFIs

The call for a merchant banking revival does not diminish the vital role of Development Finance Institutions (DFIs). DFIs possess unique mandates focused on development impact, poverty alleviation, and tackling market failures, often deploying concessional capital or pioneering investments in frontier sectors where purely commercial actors hesitate. Merchant banks, being commercially driven, cannot and should not replace this function.

.

Instead, the relationship is one of potential synergy and complementarity. DFIs can provide catalytic capital or guarantees that mitigate risk, making deals viable for commercially focused merchant banks. They can fund enabling infrastructure or policy reforms. Merchant banks, in turn, can bring private sector discipline, execution speed, and co-investment capital to DFI-backed sectors or projects, amplifying impact through commercial viability. They operate in parallel, addressing different facets of the capital spectrum.

.

.

Structure Follows Strategy: The Relevance of Permanent Capital

Traditional merchant banks often invested ‘house’ capital, implicitly adopting a long-term perspective. Today, this ethos finds a powerful structural vehicle in Permanent Capital Vehicles (PCVs). Unlike closed-end funds with fixed lifecycles, PCVs offer an indefinite investment horizon.

.

This structure is exceptionally well-suited to the merchant banking approach in Africa:

.

 It enables genuine long-term partnerships without the artificial constraints of fundraising cycles and forced exits.
 It facilitates value creation through compounding returns over extended periods.
 It aligns perfectly with the timelines of family-owned businesses and infrastructure-related ventures common on the continent.
 Firms structured as PCVs, such as Auzano Capital, explicitly embody this commitment to patient, partnership-driven investment in Africa, demonstrating a modern application of the merchant banking philosophy.

.

.

Learning from History: Why the Model Faded and Why It Must Return

The decline of traditional, independent merchant banks in Western markets from the mid-20th century stemmed from various factors – regulatory shifts like Glass-Steagall’s legacy separating banking and commerce, the rise of specialised PE giants, increased capital adequacy requirements under Basel making principal investing costly for banks, and a focus within universal banks on scalable activities like trading and large-cap advisory. These trends inevitably influenced African markets.

.

However, the need for the merchant banking function never disappeared, particularly in markets dominated by SMEs needing integrated capital and strategic support. The decline was one of structure, not relevance.

.

.

Revitalising the Ethos for Modern Africa

The ‘return’ of merchant banking to Africa isn’t about recreating historical institutions. It’s about fostering the function and ethos within the contemporary financial landscape. This requires:

.

 Encouraging Niche Players: Supporting boutique advisory firms that integrate principal investing, and specialised funds adopting a merchant banking style.
 Leveraging Patient Capital Pools: Mobilising local institutional capital (pension funds, insurers) and family offices towards longer-term, direct investment strategies.
 Recognising Structural Advantages: Appreciating how vehicles like PCVs enable the long-term partnership model.
 Supportive Ecosystems: Regulatory environments that understand and potentially facilitate long-term principal investing alongside advisory work.

.

Conclusion

Africa’s development trajectory requires diverse and sophisticated financing solutions. While investment banks, PE funds, and DFIs are indispensable, the nuanced, partnership-driven approach of merchant banking – providing patient capital coupled with strategic expertise, particularly through long-term structures like PCVs – addresses a critical gap. Fostering the revival of this ethos is not merely an exercise in financial nostalgia; it is a strategic imperative for unlocking the full potential of Africa’s vibrant private sector and building resilient, prosperous economies for the future.

.